Submission to Nature Communications is taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration. Commun. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable Associate Editor. ISSN 2041-1723 (online), Human behaviour and social sciences studies, Characterisation of chemical and biomolecular materials, Details of the manuscript transfer service, Listing of all NPG journals and subject areas, A general explanation of the relationships between Nature titles. Nature communications manuscript under consideration Update on the question. The dot pattern on a laser print often creates a moir pattern when scanned. NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, ENGLAND, N1 9XW. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. Whether or not reviewers have accepted the invitation is usually confidential information available only to journal staff. From today, our authors have the option to take advantage of In Review, a free preprint deposition service integrated with the submission process to our journal. 2017-07-13 11:21. Paper in review: "Under Editorial Consideration" - good or bad? [CDATA[> Submit final files at 100% as .cdx files. LaTeX submission must contain all references within the manuscript .tex file itself (see above TeX/LaTeX section for more details). For first submissions (i.e. Each legend should total no more than 350 words. Supplementary Information is not copy-edited byNature Communicationsafter acceptance, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented, and that the style and terminology conform with the rest of the paper. Be sure to include the word "Supplementary" each time one is mentioned. Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. We will monitor reception of this new service by our authors, and continue to evolve our offering to them in response to the needs of the community. Thus, we ask authors to recolour green-and-red heatmaps, graphs and schematics for which colours are chosen arbitrarily. In order to further promote the practice of preprinting, Nature Communications launched an initiative in 2017 that allowed authors to list the preprints of papers hosted on any platform, and undergoing peer review at our journal, on our Under Consideration web page. Please submit electronic files at acceptance and include a clear and concise legend explaining the image. Unnecessary figures should be avoided: data presented in small tables or histograms, for instance, can generally be stated briefly in the text instead. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in 9.3 weeks. Figure legends begin with a brief title sentence for the whole figure and continue with a short description of what is shown in each panel and the symbols used; methodological details should be kept to a minimum as much as possible. [CDATA[> Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Revised manuscripts should be uploaded via the link provided in the editor's decision letter. Like other Nature titles, Nature Communications has no external editorial board; editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors, who are PhD-level scientists. When possible, we prefer to use original digital figures to ensure the highest-quality reproduction in the journal. Authors who nevertheless wish to post a list of Supplementary References should ensure that the Supplementary Information is self-contained (it should not refer to the list of References in the main paper; any such papers should be duplicated in the list of Supplementary References) and that Supplementary References are numbered sequentially from 1. Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. I think I am asking this question especially because Nature Journals have their own editorial workflow which is not as same a typical workflow of many journals. Authors: Revised Manuscript Submission, Editorial Manager, How to respond Reviewer's/Editor's Comment for Manuscript Revision | #Response #letter #reviewer's. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); How long should I wait for a response from the journal? If so, how close was it? Supplementary Information should be combined and supplied as a separate file, preferably in Word format. Using Kolmogorov complexity to measure difficulty of problems? Lettering in figures should be in lower-case type, with only the first letter of each label capitalized. In Review has been offered on almost 300 Springer Nature journals since October 2018. For separate data, audio and video files we can accept any of these formats: Adobe Acrobat file (.pdf), Audio Visual Interleave (.avi), Compressed Archive File (.zip), Encapsulated Postcript (.eps), Flash Movie (.swf), Graphics Interchange Format (.gif), HTML document (.html), JPEG image (.jpg), MPEG animation (.mpg), MS Excel spreadsheet (.xls, .xlsx), MS Power Point file (.ppt, .pptx), MS Word document (.doc, .docx), Plain ASCII text (.txt), PostScript (.ps), QuickTime movie (.mov), Rich Text Format (.rtf), Systems Biology Markup Language (.sbml, .xml, .owl), TAR archive file (.tar), TIFF image (.tif), Waveform audio file (.wav), WordPerfect document (.wpd). This is known as a rescinding. As we are committed to making prompt and informed decisions about publication, we do not consider pre-submission enquiries. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". How long would it take for sucrose to undergo hydrolysis in boiling water? Nature Communications encouraged rapid dissemination of results with the launch of Under Consideration in 2017. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Global Integrated Drought Monitoring and Prediction System (GIDMaPS) data sets. In any case, there's nothing to do except wait and see. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Modulation-doped growth of mosaic graphene with single-crystalline p-n junctions for efficient photocurrent generation. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Also, if it had to be negative outcome, it wouldnt take so long for a publisher like Nature to come up with the decision, so you can relax and hope for a positive outcome. Abstract Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. [CDATA[> For general editorial enquiries, including manuscript submission queries, please contact naturecommunications@nature.com. The Science of Nature | Submission guidelines - Springer Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. The average number of days from manuscript acceptance to the first appearance of the article online. Israel's Exodus In Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. Authors are advised to substitute the image before submission of their manuscript. Please use the Nature Research Chemical Structures Guide and ChemDraw template to ensure that you prepare your figures in a format that will require minimal changes by our art and production teams. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Example: Hao, Z., AghaKouchak, A., Nakhjiri, N. & Farahmand, A. Is it possible to create a concave light? Early sharing of results in preprints has been a familiar practice for some research communities for decadesphysicists will know that the arXiv is turning 30 next year and has grown in popularity with many other communities in the past 510 years, perhaps catalysed by the launch of bioRxiv, which now serves a large community of researchers in the life sciences. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Manuscript under consideration nature - dupek.talkwireless.info I heard that a first editorial decision is likely to be made within a few days after submission. Moreover, we believe that In Review will be particularly useful in serving communities that do not yet have an established discipline-specific preprint server, as well as providing more visibility for multidisciplinary works. All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised manuscript: What does it means? Just want to clarify, that this question is specific to the editorial process of 'Nature Communications' which is not usual and not related to generalized peer review process. This page includes information on manuscripts reviewed at other Nature journals, competing interests declarations, pre-publication publicity, deposition of data as a condition of publication, availability of data and reagents after publication, human and animal subjects, digital image integrity, biosecurity, refutations, complaints, correction of mistakes, duplicate publication, confidentiality and plagiarism. Research datasets may be cited in the reference list if they have been assigned digital object identifiers (DOIs) and include authors, title, publisher (repository name), identifier (DOI expressed as a URL). Why do universities check for plagiarism in student assignments with online content? Protocols deposited by the authors will be linked to the Methods section upon publication. Additional editorial policies can be found on theNature journals joint policies page. Nature Communications (Nat Commun) Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. John H Elliott - Empires Of The Atlantic World.pdf Nat. [Solved] All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications | 9to5Science How should I interpret a particular submission status? Recents What age is too old for research advisor/professor? Information about the common editorial policies of Nature journals, including Nature Communications, is available here. Submission toNature Communicationsis taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration or in press elsewhere. Wishing to facilitate greater adoption of preprints across the multidisciplinary scope of our journal, we are retiring Under Consideration to support a new early sharing tool with added functionalities for our authors. If you want to participate in double-blind peer review, prepare your manuscript in a way that conceals the identities of all the authors and tick the appropriate box during online submission. Must lactose-free milk be ultra-pasteurized? Nature Communications is editorially independent, and its editors make their own decisions, independently of the other Nature journals. Please note that it is not possible to add/modify ORCID details at proof. We reserve the right to decline publication of a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or violations of our publishing policies. From the MTS homepage, click Modify my Springer Nature account and then ORCID Create/link an Open Researcher Contributor ID (ORCID) in the Personal Profile tab. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. Or reviewers are not responding to the editor after the request to review the revised manuscript by the editor? Volume numbers and the subsequent comma appear in bold. : ! Many colourblind readers cannot interpret visuals that rely on discrimination of green and red, for example. Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between - reddit Nature Communications. Contributors are sent proofs and are welcome to discuss proposed changes with the editors, butNature Communicationsreserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumour cell-derived microparticles. A complete manuscript package will help expedite your paper through the review and publication process. To obtain It was the first time to submit nature materials, but was rejected by the editor, and it is recommended to transfer to nature comm. LetPub It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. Press, Oxford, 2004). Why did Ukraine abstain from the UNHRC vote on China? Communications - Frankfurt Forum - Tripadvisor Within the source data file, each figure or table (in the main manuscript and in the Supplementary Information) containing relevant data should be represented by a single sheet in an Excel document, or a single .txt file or other file type in a zipped folder. and JavaScript. It is the move from what I have proposed to call "cosmotheism" (Assmann 1993), where the divine is conceived of and worshipped as immanent in natureleading ultimately to the idea that nature or cosmos is God, the visible manifestation of a hidden deityto a religion that draws a categorical distinction between God and the world . Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Is it under review by the reviewers? Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Communications (Nat Commun) Nature Practical advice and tips to track your manuscript's progress, understand its status, and identify situations that need action during the journal submission process. In Review | SpringerNature | Authors | Springer Nature Titles and abstracts in particular should be written in language that will be readily intelligible to any scientist.