17 Sep 2022 19:30:26 . Cookie Notice What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. Via CNET | Source International Committee of the Red Cross. Saryn standing trial for his war crimes as the corpses sue him for damages. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. You know, I could continue to rant on this but I'm going to cut my reply short. Advertisement. to FFXIV. Anyone who's played a GTA game knows you want to avoid killing cops because the game is unplayable if your wanted level is filled up. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. maybe games really ARE too realistic =P. The question is, how feasible are the ICRC's aims and will players really take on board the lessons about humanitarian law? Tzu would probably fall under villain now a days, as he uses real tactics to slaughter us all and take over the world while we sit here and try to "play by the rules". AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. I would be right now biggest war crimer in world history. Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. 2023 Vox Media, LLC. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. It essentially boils down to "shoot" and "don't shoot" targets like in the arcade shooters. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. How the left is pushing us toward civil war, and how this has worked in the past. No single, globally accepted treaty lists all war crimes. On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. After reading what counts as one online, and not counting repeat offences, becase for most it is more than once, and in many cases more than I would be able remember, here is a list of ingame warcrimes I have commited because I am bored; Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. and our With this thinking Ill get a call from my insurance company when I crash a G6 in Grand theft auto. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. It involves using at least one more brain cell, and that's always a good thing. I don't think this was about introducing more reality to games, that was just the most convincing excuse they could conjure up. In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause: Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable. Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Schadenfreude420 7 oct 2021. SquidRoss . But what it wouldn't let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. In the heat of the game, facing a furious mob, many players will take the lethal option but they sure as hell think about it. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. It makes me want him as a wisecracking sidekick). By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Join us on Discord at https://discord.gg/TtR32WT. Russia denies it engages in illegal attacks but proof of any use of illegal weaponry such as cluster bombs and any targeting of civilians or civilian buildings like schools and hospitals is already being collated. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Enjoy the meme 'Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?' uploaded by Bolt93. 18 Sep 2022 00:17:51 . Threaded Mode | Linear Mode. We do often see the consequences of player actions being threaded into gameplay, but this tends to be in the adventure genre. There's no reason in debating/arguing this, it just shouldn't be the issue. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. People aren't held accountable for war crimes in real life too tbh. The rules would just be a nice little piece of cheese for him to get us to follow into his traps. War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says Oct. 3, 2013, 12:16 AM PDT By Henry Austin, NBC News contributor The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video. Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. The trial was the first prosecution of a Russian service member for war crimes committed in Ukraine since the Feb. 24 invasion. TikTok video from TommyKay (@tommykaydaily): "Should gamers go to jail for ingame war crimes? But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile everyone whose played Modern Warfare 2 meme from Gamer Memes Download - MemeZila.com. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. Yes gamers should be held responsible. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. I just wanted the Sudetenland. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. 10+ should gamers be accountable for ingame war crimes most standard ; 10+ can you have 2 internet providers in one house most standard ; 10+ which statement best expresses how prospero treats caliban most standard ; 10+ divorce attorney lake st louis most standard Posted October 7, 2013 Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. What do you call a character that runs? gamers are sub-human. Thread starter Spawn; Start date Oct 5, 2013; Menu . I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. :dazed: Funny, how I read it was someone from the Red Cross saying "I think realistic military simulators should include realistic military consequences for realistic military crimes.". So I say fine and have my guys ready to launch just in case. The biggest subreddit dedicated to providing you with the meme templates you're looking for. That sounds like a really fun video game. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. In the video above, Bohemia's CEO Marek Spanel describes how Arma III copes with the breach of conflict law, saying "if you do [attack friendlies or civilians] with friendly troops around, they will attack you.". By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, 'Grand Theft Auto Online' off to a bumpy start, Video Games can help kids think and focus. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. What would be the fun in games if we couldn't massacre civillians? The Arma series currently on its third iteration is detailed enough to be used for training purposes by many of the world's standing armies. Talk about a victimless crime. Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. Tsk, tsk. The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. Quote: The Red Cross wants to have a greater influence in the virtual world of battlefields. Arma II sold 10x the copies for the zombie mod than the actual 'real life simulation' game play, hint. I was just following orders. "Nobody ever considers themselves to be the villain.". There should be no responsibility or games would get boring, we play them to escape responsibility. April 22, 2020, 10:40:49 PM. What do you call a character that stands still! Just that their warcrimes have consequences. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: Deportation or forcible transfer of population. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. It's not actually advocating that gamers themselves suffer some kind of actual punishment for committing in-game warcrimes. i play universe sandbox 2 and dbfz so. Despite this statement, the ICRC claims it's "not involved in the debate about violence in video games." Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. The way we learn little snippets about the lives of the characters passing through our border gates in Papers, Please. The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studios games will now be implementing the suggestions. Mongoose, Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. The BBC were quoting The Red Cross in an interview with The Guardian - these were not the opinions of the BBC. If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). Just by the name alone people said it was a bully simulator. But it could realistically be put in actual military simulators, such as ARMA for example. If you are having trouble subscribing with this form, try the version here. Not to mention that a vast majority of first person shooters are played by teenagers and young adults - to think that anyone would seriously consider incarcerating hundreds of thousands of children because they play video games blows my mind. The ICRC's Franois Snchaud justified his organisation's request for consequences, saying "it's very difficult to make the distinction between real footage and the footage you can get from video games." It's a game, nothing "real, or realistic" about it. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. Besides, 'realism' in cases such as this would likely amount to pushing particularly political agendas. Yeah there is some talent gettin about there Uff this lockdowns hittin hard but on the upside it aint quite a gulag where u need to pay someone in food to get inspiration to keep world peace. Hammerfell - 2 factions are always in civil war with neither holding firm leadership Black Marsh - Is a disgusting swamp Even after the Tsaesci rulers there was still the Tribunal. IE 11 is not supported. A place to post memes about Minecraft! Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. Although actually, it's more interesting than that, because the first shot fired sends the group fleeing something the player won't know until they commit to pulling the trigger. Same. Odd as it sounds, but I'd actually enjoy seeing this sort of thing in those military simulators. And vitally, those who point their gun in the air before firing get the same dispersal effect without casualties. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? - Mongoose - 10-06-2013 Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) I can neither confirm nor deny the building of Auschwitz in minecraft. Many of. Barrett explained that the ICRC were already working with production companies to incorporate these rules into games and others who they had not contacted, had also incorporated some of them into their products. I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? TheInternational Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that itwon't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. When I read the thread title, I was thinking this was a play of words on match gamers. Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. They should go check out EVE Online! if someone actually implemented this. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments reflection on innocent victims. Which, when it comes to the moral implications of a game, is incredibly horrifying. "It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant," the embassy said on its official Twitter feed on March 4. . Macsiurtain_2019 6 may 2020 605 30 Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. radicalislamgaming 3 feb 2022. Is teabagging a freshly made corpse a war crime? 12K Likes, 302 Comments. I doubt fantasy games cross their vision. Or you could just get a free pornhub premium account. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Should non-gamers be accountable for real-world war crimes? All Rights Reserved, By submitting your email, you agree to our. Seems to me that without naming names there are a fair number of politicians in my country and others that we can comfortably say are guilty of willful war crimes and crimes against humanity, but instead y'all wanna go on a witch hunt because someone plays Terran in Starcraft 2? Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Jeezsmdh. Hm, tempting. This brings in subject matter I am not comfortable to discuss on a forum. 311 6. . 1.8K 106. That leaves games with what the ICRC describes as "more fictional" settings fantasy and sci-fi out of the equation, but means the proposed consequences would be seen in games such asBattlefield 4 orCall of Duty: Ghosts, were their developers to acquiesce to the Committee's requests. This is ehy gamers are the most oppressed people in society.