Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Menu. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. No more out of focus shots. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. Your previous content has been restored. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. If not, moderators please delete this post. Having run the gamut of all the Ms, Ive settled on these two as my main M system and I suggest to others who cant shake the M bug to do something similar. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Another M10 fetish. Can you compare side by side, please? The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. Is the 262 different in this regard? With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. Compared Usage Recommendations More. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. If not, get the 262. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I posted this as a person of experience. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. : very useful. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. Help us by suggesting a value. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Plus it's lighter. Thanks for the insights Louis! To a degree, I can see their point too. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Ultra-niche appeal. . If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Be the first. Its. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. You can post now and register later. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. Ive had it for a month now. If you half press the shutter to leave the menu without pressing SET the ISO remains what it was set to before. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. Display as a link instead, To me this seems like a hassle. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? The M9 and CCD sensor. Hello. I will investigate that. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. This is an inspiring and generous website. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Congratulations on your decision. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. If you want video and live view, get the 240. I find it to be a useful feature at times. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. I would have thought that the overall condition of the camera is more important and would suggest that in the long run the choice of lens will make more difference to the pictures and enjoyment you can get out of it. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. Hi everyone. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} Yes!! Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Or pictures are completely similar? As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. Learn how your comment data is processed. I was once very happy with my M9. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. More humble pie for me! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? I cant. On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. Yura, I still use both with other M along. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Image: Leica. Hello Hamish,Great writeup. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. I use along the two M240/262/etc. Help us by suggesting a value. It depends on your needs. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. The menu is cut and dry. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. We think it rises to the challenge. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera.